Skip to main content

Parents of victim sue Walker and Bourne's estate

March 23, 2012

The family of the minor girl involved in the Dr. Andrew Bourne and Joe Walker case has filed a civil suit against Bourne's estate and Walker, according to Santa Barbara attorney Chris Kroes, who represents the minor’s family.

The complaint was filed on March 14, he said Tuesday, and is expected to be served to "at any time", he said.

The complaint includes allegations of sexual battery, serious emotional distress, that the minor was the victim of two men who made promises to take care of her long term without any intention of doing so, that the minor was the victim of a prolonged conspiracy between the two men, and more.

“Be reason of these wrongful acts of defendants, Walker and Bourne, Jane Doe and plaintiff parents sustained great fright, shock, (and) emotional and nervous distress,” the complaint concludes. “As a result, plaintiff parents, father Doe and mother Doe, have been deprived of the society of their daughter and have, and will continue to incur, medical and psychological care for their daughter.”

The complaint says any “co-conspirators” that might have aided and abetted Bourne and/or Walker might also be included in the case, including partners, agent, servants, (and) employers.” Krues did say that Bourne’s employer, Mammoth Hospital, is not named in the complaint.

The complaint does include a complaint against Dr. Bourne alone, stating that as a physician, he was a “mandated reporter” with the legal duty to report any suspected abuse of a minor to authorities.

Kroes said a civil case has a much lower threshold of proof than a criminal case. A criminal case must prove “beyond the shadow of a doubt” that the alleged crimes did occur, for it to be prosecuted by a district attorney. But a civil case, such as the one filed by the minor’s parents, needs to show “a preponderance of evidence” that the alleged crimes occurred and that damages were/are incurred.

The complaint seeks damages for out-of pocket damages, for the costs of the civil suit, for reasonable attorney fees, for punitive damages and “for such other and further relief as the court may deem appropriate.” Kroes said a trial will likely occur within 12 to 18 months.

He said information regarding Dr. Bourne’s role in the situation is available to the attorneys and court, even though the criminal case against Dr. Bourne was dropped after his suicide.

"This has been devastating," he said. "It's been devastating to the family, beyond what anyone can imagine," he said.

Comments

GREED

March 21, 2012 by Steve (not verified), 2 years 18 weeks ago
Comment: 272

DR. Bourne is dead. Why do these people want to make his Family suffer now. Pay back? No! Greed!
They should be ashamed. They wont win anything.
what they should be doing is monitoring their daughter so she does not seduce any more rich middle aged men.
The men were sick and wrong to fall for it, but it takes two to tango.
This looks more and more like a set up, I mean how could these parents have not noticed what their 13 year old daughter was doing for two years. I'm not so sure she was the victim here.
Money is evil, and to take all this families possessions in court because of what their Dad and husband fell for is evil greed!
This family has suffered enough!

Really?

March 23, 2012 by Ski_It_Up (not verified), 2 years 17 weeks ago
Comment: 274

SMELLS LIKE GREED TO ME.....Not to mention a money hungry attorney. In these economic times, everyone is trying to find $$$. If the daughter is so distraught and it's emotionally and mentally upsetting, let it be..move on! Don't drag the daughter through the ringer again. Dr. Bourne is dead.....MOVE ON PEOPLE!

Connect to Mammoth Times


Like us on Facebook
 
Follow us on Twitter

 

Classified Ads

Custom Search
Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes